A
From an evaluator’s perspective, if two institutions carry out the same task in parallel, it may raise questions such as why two institutions are assigned to a single task and whether one partner has been added without clear justification.
Therefore, even for a similar role, it is advisable to divide the work into distinct components—for example, assigning Part A to one institution and Part B to another. Evaluators tend to look for aspects they can critique, so it is best to avoid leaving room for such comments from the outset.
In particular, since many Horizon Europe proposals receive very high scores, the key is not simply to exceed the minimum threshold of 10 points, but to focus on avoiding any deductions from the maximum score of 15. In other words, a useful strategy is to ensure that all evaluation criteria are fully addressed while minimizing any potential weaknesses that could lead to point deductions.